Compelling Impacts of Natural Polymer-Centered Drug Delivery Systems as Prophylactic and Therapeutic Approaches in Various Pulmonary Disorders/Lung Diseases

Pulmonary disorders are common illness that affects people of all ages world­wide. Common pulmonary disorders include pulmonary hypertension, CF (cystic fibrosis), asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, emphysema, chronic bronchitis, lung cancer, and COVID-19. Treatments of these disorders vary but can be broadly categorized into pharmacological (medicinal), non-pharmacological, rehabilitation, and surgical techniques. Often, a combina­tion of these approaches is used, both for symptomatic relief and treatment. Regarding these prophylactic and therapeutic approaches, advances are rapidly being made, and scientists are currently investigating modern and unique theranostic methods. However, there is a lacuna in drug delivery, pharmacokinetic aspects, and drug-induced adverse effects. One particular area for improvement that needs to be immediately addressed is the drug delivery system to significantly improve healthcare associated with pulmonary disorders. Natural polymer-based drug delivery systems are widely adopted for their ease of production, lack of biotoxicity, and strong bioaffinity. Of the natural polymer­based drug delivery systems, chitosan, sodium alginates, albumin, hydroxyapa­tite, and hyaluronic acid are the most common natural polymers. Each of these natural polymers has its preferred use, either due to tissue-specific delivery or medical property packaging. The current scientific article discusses the common pulmonary disorders, their pathophysiology, and the current therapeutic approaches. Additionally, we discuss the major natural polymer drug delivery systems, including their properties and common uses. © The Author (s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2023.

Immunization technologies: Time to consider new preventative solutions for respiratory syncytial virus infections.

New technologies for the prevention of infectious diseases are emerging to address unmet medical needs, in particular, the use of long-acting monoclonal antibodies (mAb) to prevent Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) lower respiratory tract disease in infants during their first RSV season. The lack of precedent for mAbs for broad population protection creates challenges in the assessment of upcoming prophylactic long-acting mAbs for RSV, with associated consequences in legislative and registration categorization, as well as in recommendation, funding, and implementation pathways. We suggest that the legislative and regulatory categorization of preventative solutions should be decided by the effect of the product in terms of its impact on the population and health-care systems rather than by the technology used or its mechanism of action. Immunization can be passive and active, both having the same objective of prevention of infectious diseases. Long-acting prophylactic mAbs work as passive immunization, as such, their recommendations for use should fall under the remit of National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups or other relevant recommending bodies for inclusion into National Immunization Programs. Current regulations, policy, and legislative frameworks need to evolve to embrace such innovative preventative technologies and acknowledge them as one of key immunization and public health tools.

Pharmacological Agents Targeting Coagulopathy in COVID-19: A Review

Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) and the resultant syndrome COVID-19 has wrecked the entire world. The disease mostly manifests as mild viral pneumonia but in a small proportion of patients it can produce an intense inflammatory and prothrombotic state leading to multiorgan failure and even death. Varying incidences of venous thromboembolism (VTE) have been found in COVID-19 patients. This review describes the role of various pharmacological agents used prophylactically as well as therapeutically for thromboembolism in such patients. The anticoagulants which are administered as antithrombotic therapy can be used parenterally (heparin and direct thrombin inhibitors) or orally (direct oral thrombin inhibitors). The mechanism of action, pharmacology, usage, and adverse effects of such agents has been discussed especially in the context of ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. As a result of various completed and ongoing clinical trials, scientific community has collected promising evidence and formulated guidelines regarding the role of anticoagulants in COVID-19 patients. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021.

Preventive Efficacy of Domestic Vaccines against a New Coronavirus Infection in the Immunization of Employees of Medical Organizations

Relevance. Evaluation of the preventive effectiveness of domestic vaccines in immunization of employees of medical organizations, in the context of the ongoing pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, remains important. The aim. To evaluate the preventive effectiveness of domestic vaccines in the immunization of employees of medical organizations. Materials and methods. The preventive efficacy of domestic vaccines was studied in an epidemiological, analytical, retrospective (historical), cohort, parallel study involving 1115 healthcare workers from various outpatient and policlinic organizations in the city of Perm. Results. The high preventive efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination of health care workers was established in the conditions of analytical cohort study (the incidence of the unvaccinated was 3.3 times higher than the incidence of vaccinated). Among the vaccinated, a milder course of the disease was observed. The GamCovidVac Spuntic V and Sputnik Light vaccines were characterized by the highest prophylactic efficacy for which was 76.1 and 78.2 respectively, against 54.53 with Covivac immunization and 50.7 with EpiVacCorona. Conclusions. Vaccination is an effective measure against COVID-19 and can be recommended in the context of ongoing pandemic. © 2023, Numikom. All rights reserved.

High-Dose Prophylactic Anticoagulation for COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Review of Benefits and Risks.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact on a global scale, causing significant morbidity and mortality. The virus affects multiple organ systems, including the respiratory, cardiovascular, and coagulation systems, leading to severe pneumonia in some patients. Moreover, COVID-19 patients with severe pneumonia have a high incidence of thrombotic events, which can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Given the potential benefits of anticoagulation therapy in COVID-19 patients with thrombotic complications, recent studies have proposed high-dose prophylactic anticoagulation (HD-PA) therapy as a potential treatment option. In fact, some studies have suggested that HD-PA therapy may be more effective in reducing thrombotic events and mortality rates than other treatment options. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the benefits and risks of HD-PA therapy for COVID-19 pneumonia patients. By synthesizing and analyzing the latest available research, we highlight patient selection criteria and discuss the optimal dosage, duration, and timing of therapy. Additionally, we review the potential risks associated with HD-PA therapy and provide recommendations for clinical practice. Ultimately, this review provides valuable insights into the use of HD-PA therapy in COVID-19 pneumonia patients and paves the way for further research in this critical area. By exploring the benefits and risks of this treatment option, we hope to provide healthcare professionals with the information they need to make informed decisions about the best course of treatment for their patients.

Utilization of prophylactic drugs for covid-19 infection among health care workers at government medical college Srinagar-a retrospective observational study

Introduction: Corona virus disease (COVID-19) was declared as a Pandemic by WHO on March 11, 2020. Since health care workers play an important role in providing care to infected patients, they are exposed to unprecedented levels of risk. At the initial phase of this pandemic, no definitive treatment was available, the only way to combat this disease was prevention. A number of prophylactic drugs were being studied during that time for use by health care workers. On 23rd March 2020, Government of India issued recommendation through National Task Force for Covid-19, for using Hydroxychloroquine as prophylaxis for SARS COV-2. Preclinical studies of Azithromycin have shown immunomodulation and in vitro activity against SARS-COV-2, that has led to its widespread usage during COVID-19. Ivermectin, an antiparasitic drug was reported to have an in vitro activity against SARS-COV-2. This orally administered drug was included in India's revised National COVID-19 treatment protocol for people with mild infection. Vitamin C, a water soluble vitamin has been considered for potential beneficial effects in COVID-19 disease. Many animal studies have indicated that a daily intake of vitamin C may prevent infections. Aim(s): To evaluate the pattern of drugs (HCQ, AZITHROMYCIN, IVERMECTIN,and VITAMIN C) used for COVID-19 prophylaxis among health care workers at GMC, Srinagar. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is being conducted by using a survey questionnaire. A survey questionnaire in English has been developed after literature review. The responses will be analyzed using descriptive statistics of frequency and percentage.

Enveloped Viruses: Pathogenetic Targets for Cyanobacterial Lectins.

Lectins are a group of highly specific carbohydrate-binding proteins with a wide spectrum of action, involved in the so-called <<first line>> of body defense. These unique biomolecules show high specificity for various mono- and oligosaccharides, primarily for viral and bacterial glycoconjugates. Cyanobacteria lectins are effective against enveloped viruses and are an appealing alternative to existing synthetic drugs. Virtually complete absence of resistance formation in viruses to these compounds is known. The purpose of this review is to analyze, summarize, and discuss the results of experimental studies in vivo and in vitro, illustrating the mechanisms of action and antiviral effects of lectins obtained from cyanobacteria in relation to the most dangerous and socially significant viruses: SARS-Cov-2, HIV, Ebola viruses, influenza, and hepatitis C. In addition, the article outlines some of the challenges that must be overcome in order to obtain effective antiviral drugs in the future.Copyright © Team of Authors, 2022.

Enveloped Viruses: Pathogenetic Targets for Cyanobacterial Lectins.

Lectins are a group of highly specific carbohydrate-binding proteins with a wide spectrum of action, involved in the so-called <<first line>> of body defense. These unique biomolecules show high specificity for various mono- and oligosaccharides, primarily for viral and bacterial glycoconjugates. Cyanobacteria lectins are effective against enveloped viruses and are an appealing alternative to existing synthetic drugs. Virtually complete absence of resistance formation in viruses to these compounds is known. The purpose of this review is to analyze, summarize, and discuss the results of experimental studies in vivo and in vitro, illustrating the mechanisms of action and antiviral effects of lectins obtained from cyanobacteria in relation to the most dangerous and socially significant viruses: SARS-Cov-2, HIV, Ebola viruses, influenza, and hepatitis C. In addition, the article outlines some of the challenges that must be overcome in order to obtain effective antiviral drugs in the future.Copyright © Team of Authors, 2022.

A plain language summary of the Janssen COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness and safety as a single dose and with a booster

Summary What is this summary about? This is a summary of the results of 2 global clinical studies of the Janssen Ad26.COV2.S vaccine against COVID-19. The ENSEMBLE study looked at the effectiveness of a single injection of the vaccine. The separate ENSEMBLE2 study looked at the effectiveness of a booster dose of the vaccine given 2 months after the first dose. In both studies, people received either the vaccine or a placebo. Vaccine effectiveness was evaluated 14 and 28 days after vaccination to allow sufficient time for generation of an immune response. What were the results? In ENSEMBLE, compared to the placebo, a single dose of the vaccine prevented: 56% of moderate to severe-critical COVID-19 cases occurring at least 14 days after vaccination 53% of moderate to severe-critical COVID-19 cases occurring at least 28 days after vaccination 75% of severe-critical COVID-19 cases occurring at least 28 days after vaccination 76% of people with COVID-19 from needing to be hospitalized for treatment 83% of COVID-19-related deaths The vaccine continued to work well for at least 6 months after a single vaccine injection. In ENSEMBLE2, compared to the placebo, a single dose of the vaccine followed by a booster dose 2 months later prevented: 75% of moderate to severe-critical COVID-19 cases occurring at least 14 days after booster vaccination 100% of severe-critical COVID-19 cases occurring at least 14 days after booster vaccination In ENSEMBLE2, there were too few cases of COVID-19 to estimate vaccine effectiveness for preventing COVID-19-related deaths or hospitalization. ENSEMBLE2 was done during early 2021, when several COVID-19 vaccines became available by emergency use authorization. For ethical reasons, people could check whether they had received vaccine or placebo and decide whether they could be vaccinated outside of the study. This meant that the researchers could not look at the long-term effectiveness of the vaccine. In both studies, after receiving the vaccine, some people experienced pain at the injection site, headache, tiredness, muscle pain, and nausea. In most cases, these were mild and went away within a few days. Serious side effects were very rare. In ENSEMBLE, blood clots, seizures, hives, and ringing in the ears were more common in the people who got the vaccine than in those who got the placebo. These side effects were very rare. In ENSEMBLE2, bleeding, hives, and ringing in the ears were slightly more common in people who got the vaccine than those who got the placebo. In ENSEMBLE2, blood clots were more common in people who got the placebo. At the time of the study, it was not clear if these side effects were caused by the vaccine. What do the results of the study mean? The vaccine was effective at protecting against moderate to severe-critical COVID-19 at 14 days after a single injection. Effectiveness was increased by a booster injection given 2 months after the first injection. You can find more detailed information and references in the original articles. Links to these articles can be found at the end of this summary. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04505722 and NCT04614948 (ClinicalTrials.gov) </sec.Copyright © 2022 The Authors.

Biomarkers of COVID-19 and technologies to combat SARS-CoV-2.

Due to the unprecedented public health crisis caused by COVID-19, our first contribution to the newly launching journal, Advances in Biomarker Sciences and Technology, has abruptly diverted to focus on the current pandemic. As the number of new COVID-19 cases and deaths continue to rise steadily around the world, the common goal of healthcare providers, scientists, and government officials worldwide has been to identify the best way to detect the novel coronavirus, named SARS-CoV-2, and to treat the viral infection - COVID-19. Accurate detection, timely diagnosis, effective treatment, and future prevention are the vital keys to management of COVID-19, and can help curb the viral spread. Traditionally, biomarkers play a pivotal role in the early detection of disease etiology, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. To assist myriad ongoing investigations and innovations, we developed this current article to overview known and emerging biomarkers for SARS-CoV-2 detection, COVID-19 diagnostics, treatment and prognosis, and ongoing work to identify and develop more biomarkers for new drugs and vaccines. Moreover, biomarkers of socio-psychological stress, the high-technology quest for new virtual drug screening, and digital applications are described.

Protective Vaccination Used by Doctors for Prevention of Infections.

Doctors, as with all healthcare workers, are a specific risk group due to a high probability of contact with contagious pathogens. An online survey was conducted among Polish doctors to establish their use of protective vaccination to decrease their personal risk of infection. The online survey was conducted using questions about medics' vaccination decisions and approaches. The results revealed that immunization against VPDs for most participants was not adequate based on recommendations or developments in vaccinology. To increase vaccination as a prophylactic method among doctors, especially those not involved in the immunization of patients, an educational campaign is demanded. As non-immunized medics are at risk themselves and are also a threat to the safety of patients, legal changes and the monitoring of vaccine acceptance and perception among medics are required.

A case report on uneventful anticoagulation and persistence of Type 1 Respiratory Failure post severe COVID-19 infection in a patient of Osler-Weber-Rendu syndrome.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has led researchers worldwide to study the patterns of association of SARS-CoV-2 with different diseases, which have been a prime focus of medical literature. Osler-Weber-Rendu syndrome, also known as hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), is a rare genetic disorder in which patients present with recurrent epistaxis, nostril manipulations, and multiple arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) along with telangiectasias involving internal organs and mucocutaneous areas. In addition, these AVMs are prone to bleeding or act as a nidus for thrombus formation, apart from other serious complications, such as chronic hypoxemia, anemia, pulmonary artery hypertension, heart failure, and cerebrovascular accidents. Here, we present a case report of a patient who presented with acute onset respiratory complaints, had multiple episodes of epistaxis in the past, and was later diagnosed with HHT as per Curaçao criteria in our hospital. Doppler ultrasound over the left calf region showed an AVM. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) angiography of the chest and abdomen revealed multiple pulmonary and hepatic AVMs along with splenic and uterine telangiectasias and malformations, who on acquiring severe COVID-19 infection developed complications such as anemia, pulmonary artery hypertension, sepsis, acute kidney injury, and post-COVID-19 persistence of Type 1 respiratory failure. Furthermore, the risk-benefit ratio of anticoagulation therapy in such patients with COVID-19 infection is tricky and challenging. However, our patient was prophylactically anti-coagulated with enoxaparin for 12 days with an uneventful outcome.

A novel mAb broadly neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 VOCs in vitro and in vivo, including the Omicron variants.

Novel immune escape variants have emerged as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to spread worldwide. Many of the variants cause breakthrough infections in vaccinated populations, posing great challenges to current antiviral strategies targeting the immunodominance of the receptor-binding domain within the spike protein. Here, we found that a novel broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibody (mAb), G5, provided efficient protection against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) in vitro and in vivo. A single dose of mAb G5 could significantly inhibit the viral burden in mice challenged with the mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 variant, as well as the body weight loss and cytokine release induced by mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2. The refined epitope recognized by mAb G5 was identified as 1148 FKEELDKYF1156 in the stem helix of subunit S2. In addition, a human-mouse chimeric mAb was generated based on the variable region of heavy chain and VL genes of mAb G5. Our study provides a broad antibody drug candidate against SARS-CoV-2 VOCs and reveals a novel target for developing pan-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

Recent advancements in single dose slow-release devices for prophylactic vaccines.

Single dose slow-release vaccines herald a new era in vaccine administration. An ideal device for slow-release vaccine delivery would be minimally invasive and self-administered, making these approaches an attractive alternative for mass vaccination programs, particularly during the time of a pandemic. In this review article, we discuss the latest advances in this field, specifically for prophylactic vaccines able to prevent infectious diseases. Recent studies have found that slow-release vaccines elicit better immune responses and often do not require cold chain transportation and storage, thus drastically reducing the cost, streamlining distribution, and improving efficacy. This promise has attracted significant attention, especially when poor patient compliance of the standard multidose vaccine regimes is considered. Single dose slow-release vaccines are the next generation of vaccine tools that could overcome most of the shortcomings of present vaccination programs and be the next platform technology to combat future pandemics. This article is categorized under: Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Emerging Technologies Implantable Materials and Surgical Technologies > Nanomaterials and Implants Biology-Inspired Nanomaterials > Protein and Virus-Based Structures.

Spinal Anesthesia in Hemodynamic Instability: A Case Report.

Anesthetic dilemmas are not rare in daily practice. Frequently, patients present with comorbid conditions that make general anesthesia risky (e.g., difficult airway and severe pulmonary dysfunction) and contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia at the same time. Reports on the successful anesthetic management of these patients can provide useful information. We report a case of a patient with severe hemodynamic instability who underwent spinal anesthesia for surgical hip debridement. General anesthesia and airway manipulation were avoided because the patient had recently recovered from SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia amid the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic when very little was known about the disease and no ventilators were available for postoperative care. We explain in detail the continuous spinal anesthesia technique using a conventional epidural catheter and prophylactic norepinephrine when cardiovascular instability was the major concern.

Prophylactic treatment with oral azithromycin in cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic (OnCoVID): a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer are at high risk for severe courses of COVID-19. Based on (pre-)clinical data suggesting a potential protective effect due to the immunomodulating properties of azithromycin, we have initiated a prospective randomized trial. METHODS: This randomized, single-center, single-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial included adult patients with cancer undergoing systemic treatment. Patients were 1:1 randomized to oral azithromycin (1500 mg once weekly for 8 weeks) or placebo. The primary endpoint was the cumulative number of SARS-CoV-2 infections 12 weeks after treatment initiation. RESULTS: In total, 523 patients were screened, 68 patients were randomized, and 63 patients received at least one dose of the study drug. Due to low acceptance and a lack of SARS-CoV-2 infections in the study cohort, the study was prematurely closed. With no reported grade III-IV possibly treatment-related adverse events, azithromycin was generally well tolerated. Overall survival (OS) rates after 12 months were 83.5% and 70.3% in the azithromycin and placebo group, respectively (p = 0.37). Non-SARS-CoV-2 infections occurred in 4/32 (12.5%) in the azithromycin and 3/31 (9.7%) in the placebo group (p = 1). No emergence of azithromycin-resistant S. aureus strains could be observed. According to treatment group, longitudinal alterations in systemic inflammatory parameters were detected for neutrophil/lymphocyte and leukocyte/lymphocyte ratios. CONCLUSION: Although efficacy could not be assessed due to premature closure and low incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections, azithromycin was associated with a favorable side effect profile in patients with cancer. As other prophylactic treatments are limited, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination remains a high priority in oncological patients. CLINICALTRIALS: gov registration number and date (dd/mm/yyyy): NCT04369365, 30/04/2020.

EffEctiveness of Prophylactic fOam dressings in the prevention of saCral pressure injuries in at-risk hospitalised patients: the EEPOC trial.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic dressings are increasingly used to prevent pressure injuries in hospitalised patients. However, evidence regarding the effectiveness of these dressings is still emerging. This trial aims to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a prophylactic silicone foam border dressing in preventing sacral pressure injuries in medical-surgical patients. METHODS: This is a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel group, randomised controlled trial. A sample size of 1320 was calculated to have >90% power to detect a 5% difference in the primary outcome at an alpha of 0.05. Adult patients admitted to participating medical-surgical wards are screened for eligibility: ≥18 years, admitted to hospital within the previous 36 h, expected length of stay of ≥24 h, and assessed high risk for hospital-acquired pressure injury. Consenting participants are randomly allocated to either prophylactic silicone foam dressing intervention or usual care without any dressing as the control group via a web-based randomisation service independent of the trial. Patients are enrolled across three Australian hospitals. The primary outcome is the cumulative incidence of patients who develop a sacral pressure injury. Secondary outcomes include the time to sacral pressure injury, incidence of severity (stage) of sacral pressure injury, cost-effectiveness of dressings, and process evaluation. Participant outcomes are assessed daily for up to 14 days by blinded independent outcome assessors using de-identified, digitally modified sacral photographs. Those who develop a sacral pressure injury are followed for an additional 14 days to estimate costs of pressure injury treatment. Analysis of clinical outcomes will be based on intention-to-treat, per-protocol, and sensitivity analyses. DISCUSSION: This trial aims to provide definitive evidence on the effect prophylactic dressings have on the development of hospital-acquired sacral pressure injuries in medical-surgical patients. A parallel economic evaluation of pressure injury prevention and treatment will enable evidence-informed decisions and policy. The inclusion of a process evaluation will help to explain the contextual factors that may have a bearing on trial results including the acceptability of the dressings to patients and staff. The trial commenced 5 March 2020 and has been significantly delayed due to COVID-19. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ANZCTR ACTRN12619000763145. Prospectively registered on 22 May 2019.

Safety and efficacy of prophylactic anticoagulation versus therapeutic anticoagulation in hospital-admitted COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 disease-related coagulopathy and thromboembolic complication, an important aspect of the disease pathophysiology, are frequent and associated with poor outcomes, particularly significant in hospitalized patients. Undoubtedly, anticoagulation forms a cornerstone for the management of hospitalized COVID-19 patients, but the appropriate dosing has been inconclusive and a subject of research. We aim to review existing literature and compare safety and efficacy outcomes of prophylactic and therapeutic dose anticoagulation in such patients. METHODS: We did a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of prophylactic dose anticoagulation when compared with therapeutic dosing in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE and COCHRANE databases from 2019 to 2021, without any restriction by language. We screened records, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the studies. RCTs that directly compare therapeutic and prophylactic anticoagulants dosing and are not placebo-controlled trials were included. Analyses of data were conducted using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird analysis). The study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021265948). RESULTS: We included three studies in the final quantitative analysis. The incidence of thromboembolic events in therapeutic anticoagulation was lower in comparison with prophylactic anticoagulation in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and reached statistical significance [RR 1·45, 95% CI (1.07, 1.97) I2 -0%], whereas major bleeding as an adverse event was found lower in prophylactic anticoagulation in comparison with therapeutic anticoagulation that was statistically significant [RR 0·42, 95% CI(0.19, 0.93) I2 -0%]. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that therapeutic dose anticoagulation is more effective in preventing thromboembolic events than prophylactic dose but significantly increases the risk of major bleeding as an adverse event. So, the risk-benefit ratio must be considered while using either of them.

The Influence of the Rapid Increase in the Number of Adverse Event Reports for COVID-19 Vaccine on the Disproportionality Analysis Using JADER.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The COVID-19 prophylactic vaccine for the prevention of coronavirus infection was approved in Japan on February 14, 2021. Adverse event reports for the vaccine were collected from the Japan Adverse Drug Event Relief (JADER) database, similar to those for drugs. Reported odds ratios (RORs) and proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) are commonly used in disproportionality analysis to detect safety signals. Therefore, adverse event reports from the vaccinated population may affect the detection of safety signals for the registered drugs. This study determined the impact of adverse event reports on the detection of safety signals for a COVID-19 prophylactic vaccine by analyzing the JADER database using disproportionality analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We extracted data from the JADER dataset, in which the COVID-19 vaccine was reported as a suspected drug, and selected the top 10 adverse events in terms of the number of reports. We then extracted the top 30 drugs by the amount of information in the selected 10 adverse events and compared the changes in the number of signal detections with and without the COVID-19 vaccine report data. RESULTS: The total number of adverse events reported in the JADER database during the study period was 2,002,564. Of the total number of reports, 85,489 (4.3%) reported adverse events related to the COVID-19 vaccine. Of the top 30 drugs reported in the 10 selected adverse events, the ROR and PRR were found to be lower with the inclusion of COVID-19 vaccine data than without. Detection by ROR excluded 23 out of 245 drugs, and detection by PRR excluded 34 out of 204 drugs. CONCLUSION: The rapid increase in the number of adverse event reports for the COVID-19 vaccine in JADER may affect the detection of safety signals by disproportionality analysis.

Prophylaxis and Remediation for Future Pandemic Pathogens-(Lessons from a Post-COVID World).

Since influenza and coronaviruses are currently deadly and emerging threats worldwide, better treatment, remediation and prevention options are needed. In that regard, a basic understanding of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV-2/COVID-19 (Betacoronaviridae) and other viral pathogen mechanisms of transmission are expected. Unfortunately, unprecedented, and growing distrust of vaccines and even masks or personal protective equipment (PPE) in the United States and elsewhere presents itself as an added challenge. We postulate that development of improved and highly effective prophylactic measures, together with new life-saving therapies that do inhibit or otherwise treat infection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza and other viral pathogens, could be an adjunct measure to globally protect vulnerable individuals from pandemic threats. In this review, we share what we learned from the past COVID experience to offer a multifactorial and improved approach to current and future pandemic infections or threats using low-cost means.